Know a Liberal: Gay Marriage
September 10, 2006 (This post is another in my personal 'Know a Liberal' series. Note that the category is Know a Liberal, not Know all Liberals)
If two adults love each other and wish to declare that love publicly and commit to each other, they should be able to do so.
I absolutely do not understand the fear or hatred or whatever the heck is the motivation behind the Defense of Marriage Act that Clinton signed. Even more ridiculous is Bush's proposal for a Constitutional Amendment "protecting marriage". Protecting marriage from what? With the most recent available numbers putting the divorce rate in the USA at 43% it would appear that we heterosexuals don't have such a good track record when it comes to respecting the sanctity of marriage.
As far as marriage needing to be between two individuals of the opposite sex, just why is that? It seems to me that this 'requirement' is based on individual prejudice. That prejudice may well come from one's religious affiliation, but that should have no bearing whatsoever on public law. Many religions have rules or teachings to which others do not adhere. Some Jews wear a yarmulke (skullcap); muslimas might wear a khimar (headscarf); Hindus might refrain from eating meat. Religious practices differ widely, and as long as these practices do not restrict the rights of non-believers, that is fine. Preventing two people from marrying on the basis of one's own religious beliefs is wrong.



