Sen Harry Reid: A toast to you sir!
November 1, 2005 "The U.S. Senate has been hijacked by the Democratic leaders".
That's how Bill Frist reacted to the democrats FINALLY speaking up and taking a step to getting the Bush administration and the neo-conservative right to own up to the lies and deception that led the United States to invade Iraq. What the heck is Frist so riled about? That someone had the unmitigated audacity to suggest that the investigation into the lead-up to the Iraq War - an investigation that was promised a YEAR ago - that someone might actually want the "moral" right to honor their promise? Oh, the horror! Yes, Mr Frist, this is most certainly an outrage.
Ever since the Supreme Court appointed George W Bush as president after the 2000 election, we as a nation have been subjected to the lies, diversions, and repression of a regime the likes of which we've not seen (at least not in my lifetime in this country). Sure, Roosevelt tried to expand and pad the Supreme Court to further his agenda, Nixon had Watergate, Johnson lied and got us into Vietnam ...these have all gone before and plenty of other dishonorable activities by our leaders.
Clinton's stupid lying about his affair with Lewinsky doesn't belong in this conversation, in case anyone reading this was starting to foam at the mouth. Clinton cheated on his wife. He lied about it. That's wrong. So WHAT? That's got NOTHING to do with Bush ...except that GW Bush has kept trying to make folks think that he's taking the high moral road after the "shame" of the Clinton years. The Republican craziness over Clinton has always struck me as absurd. But that's politics. Heck, they had to focus on SOMETHING when things seemed to be going pretty well with the economy and we weren't in any long-term wars. Of course, we had the likes of DeLay and others at the time talking about how shameful Clinton's use of the military was, and how it was certainly possible to support the troops and not support the president. But that was Republicans talking about a Demo president. Now that it's a Republican in the White House, it's suddenly NOT possible to support the troops if one does NOT support the president. Right.
Johnson's lying about the Gulf of Tonkin is the only thing at all similar to what Dubya has been doing to this country and the world. But at least there were POSITIVE things to come out of the Johnson administration (Johnson had a rather dismal record on civil rights from his Texas days, but as president he did support and see the passage of the Civil Rights Act).
Meanwhile, we have George W Bush and the neo-cons running roughshod over the economy, repeatedly deceiving Americans into thinking there's some kind of connection between Sept 11 2001 and Saddam Hussein (admittedly, Americans should exercise a LOT more skepticism before believing what politicians imply), starting a war we had NO RIGHT to start. Ransacking any semblance of the fiscal responsibility for which Republicans of generations past had been known ...And for what? Record debt,thousands ...THOUSANDS!!! of our men and women dead for a war orchestrated from deception.
Mr Bush is "pro-life", yet has no problem with tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis dying.
Did anyone else notice that about the same time Patrick Fitzgerald was speaking to the press about the Libby indictment, we had Cheney addressing the troops and Bush talking about raising the terror alert ...hmmm. Funny how every time there's bad news around the Bush camp, there's suddenly a new terror alert.
How'd that go, George? Wasn't it something like, "Fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again". Well, America has GOT to be getting tired of letting itself be fooled.
The emperor has been naked since before he took the throne, and folks are starting to notice that it's not a pretty sight.
Politics 

Well I have decided I must dedicate myself to the spreading of the word of Pastafarianism... the news of the Flying Spaghetti Monster and his noodly appendage. Please join with others at